The mhgr function computes the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel stratified risk ratio and its confidence limits using the Greenland-Robins variance estimator.
The lrcum function takes the results of a series of 2x2 tables representing the relationship between test positivity and diagnosis and computes positive and negative likelihood ratios (with all their deficiencies) and the variance of their logarithms. Cumulative likelihood ratios and their confidence intervals (assuming independence of tests) are computed, assuming a string of all positive tests or a string of all negative tests. The method of Simel et al as described in Altman et al is used.
mhgr(y, group, strata, conf.int =0.95)## S3 method for class 'mhgr'print(x,...)lrcum(a, b, c, d, conf.int =0.95)## S3 method for class 'lrcum'print(x, dec=3,...)
Arguments
y: a binary response variable
group: a variable with two unique values specifying comparison groups
strata: the stratification variable
conf.int: confidence level
x: an object created by mhgr or lrcum
a: frequency of true positive tests
b: frequency of false positive tests
c: frequency of false negative tests
d: frequency of true negative tests
dec: number of places to the right of the decimal to print for lrcum
...: addtitional arguments to be passed to other print functions
Details
Uses equations 4 and 13 from Greenland and Robins.
Returns
a list of class "mhgr" or of class "lrcum".
References
Greenland S, Robins JM (1985): Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics 41:55-68.
# Greate Migraine dataset used in Example 28.6 in the SAS PROC FREQ guided <- expand.grid(response=c('Better','Same'), treatment=c('Active','Placebo'), sex=c('female','male'))d$count <- c(16,11,5,20,12,16,7,19)d
# Expand data frame to represent raw datar <- rep(1:8, d$count)d <- d[r,]with(d, mhgr(response=='Better', treatment, sex))# Discrete survival time example, to get Cox-Mantel relative risk and CL# From Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG, Categorical Data Analysis Using the# SAS System, 2nd Edition, Sectino 17.3, p. 596-599## Input data in Table 17.5d <- expand.grid(treatment=c('A','P'), center=1:3)d$healed2w <- c(15,15,17,12,7,3)d$healed4w <- c(17,17,17,13,17,17)d$notHealed4w <- c(2,7,10,15,16,18)d
# Reformat to the way most people would collect raw datad1 <- d[rep(1:6, d$healed2w),]d1$time <-'2'd1$y <-1d2 <- d[rep(1:6, d$healed4w),]d2$time <-'4'd2$y <-1d3 <- d[rep(1:6, d$notHealed4w),]d3$time <-'4'd3$y <-0d <- rbind(d1, d2, d3)d$healed2w <- d$healed4w <- d$notHealed4w <-NULLd
# Finally, duplicate appropriate observations to create 2 and 4-week# risk sets. Healed and not healed at 4w need to be in the 2-week# risk set as not healedd2w <- subset(d, time=='4')d2w$time <-'2'd2w$y <-0d24 <- rbind(d, d2w)with(d24, table(y, treatment, time, center))# Matches Table 17.6with(d24, mhgr(y, treatment, interaction(center, time, sep=';')))# Get cumulative likelihood ratios and their 0.95 confidence intervals# based on the following two tables## Disease Disease# + - + -# Test + 39 3 20 5# Test - 21 17 22 15lrcum(c(39,20), c(3,5), c(21,22), c(17,15))