Multi-State Reliability Demonstration Tests (MSRDT)
Consumer's Risk for Binomial RDT
Probability Core for Binomial RDT
Binary Indicator for Binomial RDT
Optimal Test Sample Size for Binomial RDT
Consumer's Risk for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Failure Modes (MFM)
Probability Core for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Failure Modes (MFM)
Binary Indicator for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Failure Modes (MFM)
Optimal Test Sample Size for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Failure Mod...
Binary Indicator for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods
Consumer's Risk for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods and Criteria...
Probability Core for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods and Criteri...
Optimal Test Sample Size for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods and...
Consumer's Risk for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods and Criteria...
Probability Core for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods and Criteri...
Optimal Test Sample Size for Multi-state RDT with Multiple Periods and...
Beta Prior Simulation for Binomial RDT
Dirichlet Prior Simulation for Multi-state RDT
This is a implementation of design methods for multi-state reliability demonstration tests (MSRDT) with failure count data, which is associated with the work from the published paper "Multi-state Reliability Demonstration Tests" by Suiyao Chen et al. (2017) <doi:10.1080/08982112.2017.1314493>. It implements two types of MSRDT, multiple periods (MP) and multiple failure modes (MFM). For MP, two different scenarios with criteria on cumulative periods (Cum) or separate periods (Sep) are implemented respectively. It also provides the implementation of conventional design method, namely binomial tests for failure count data.