Computes arbitrary, benevolent and aggressive formulations of cross-efficiency under any returns-to-scale. Doyle and Green (1994) present three alternatives ways of formulating the secondary goal (wich will minimize or maximize the other DMUs' cross-efficiencies in some way). Methods II and III are implemented in deaR with any returns-to-scale. The maverick index is also calculated.
datadea: An object of class dea or deadata. If it is of class dea it must have been obtained with some of the multiplier DEA models.
dmu_eval: A numeric vector. Only the multipliers of DMUs in dmu_eval
are computed. If NULL (default), all DMUs are considered.
dmu_ref: A numeric vector containing which DMUs are the evaluation reference set. If NULL (default), all DMUs are considered.
epsilon: Numeric, multipliers must be >= epsilon.
orientation: A string, equal to "io" (input-oriented) or "oo" (output-oriented).
rts: A string, determining the type of returns to scale, equal to "crs" (constant), "vrs" (variable), "nirs" (non-increasing), "ndrs" (non-decreasing) or "grs" (generalized).
L: Lower bound for the generalized returns to scale (grs).
U: Upper bound for the generalized returns to scale (grs).
selfapp: Logical. If it is TRUE, self-appraisal is included in the average scores of A and e.
correction: Logical. If it is TRUE, a correction is applied in the "vrs" input-oriented model in order to avoid negative cross-efficiencies, according to Lim & Zhu (2015).
M2: Logical. If it is TRUE, it computes Method II for aggresive/benevolent estimations.
M3: Logical. If it is TRUE, it computes Method III for aggresive/benevolent estimations.
Note
(1) We can obtain negative cross-efficiency in the input-oriented DEA model under no constant returns-to-scale. However, the same does not happen in the case of the output-oriented VRS DEA model. For this reason, the proposal of Lim and Zhu (2015) is implemented in deaR to calculate the input-oriented cross-efficiency model under no constant returns-to-scale.
(2) The multiplier model can have alternate optimal solutions (see note 1 in model_multiplier). So, depending on the optimal weights selected we can obtain different cross-efficiency scores.
Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H.; Hogan, A.J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman RH (ed) Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis, vol 32. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 73–104. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/ev.1441")
Doyle, J.; Green, R. (1994). “Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and the uses”, Journal of Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.2307/2584392")
Cook, W.D.; Zhu, J. (2015). DEA Cross Efficiency. In: Zhu, J. (ed) Data Envelopment Analysis. A Handbook of Models and Methods. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 221. Springer, Boston, MA, 23-43. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1007/978-1-4899-7553-9_2")
Lim, S.; Zhu, J. (2015). "DEA Cross-Efficiency Under Variable Returns to Scale". Journal of Operational Research Society, 66(3), p. 476-487. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1057/jors.2014.13")