mat: a square matrix or a data frame consisting of (individual) binary choice data; row stimuli are chosen over column stimuli
alternative: a character string specifying the alternative hypothesis, must be one of "two.sided" (default), "less" or "greater"
exact: a logical indicating whether an exact p-value should be computed
correct: a logical indicating whether to apply continuity correction in the chi-square approximation for the p-value
simulate.p.value: a logical indicating whether to compute p-values by Monte Carlo simulation
nsim: an integer specifying the number of replicates used in the Monte Carlo test
Details
Kendall's coefficient of consistency,
zeta=1−T/Tmax,
lies between one (perfect consistency) and zero, where T is the observed number of circular triads, and the maximum possible number of circular triads is Tmax=n(n2−4)/24, if n is even, and Tmax=n(n2−1)/24 else, and n is the number of stimuli or objects being judged. For details see Kendall and Babington Smith (1940) and David (1988).
Kendall (1962) discusses a test of the hypothesis that the number of circular triads T is different (smaller or greater) than expected when choosing randomly. For small n, an exact p-value is computed, based on the exact distributions listed in Alway (1962) and in Kendall (1962). Otherwise, an approximate chi-square test is computed. In this test, the sampling distribution is measured from lower to higher values of T, so that the probability that T will be exceeded is the complement of the probability for chi2. The chi-square approximation may be incorrect if n<8 and is only available for n>4.
Returns
T: number of circular triads
T.max: maximum possible number of circular triads
T.exp: expected number of circular triads E(T) when choices are totally random
zeta: Kendall's coefficient of consistency
chi2, df, correct: the chi-square statistic and degrees of freedom for the approximate test, and whether continuity correction has been applied
p.value: the p-value for the test (see Details)
simulate.p.value, nsim: whether the p-value is based on simulations, number of simulation runs
References
Alway, G.G. (1962). The distribution of the number of circular triads in paired comparisons. Biometrika, 49 , 265--269. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1093/biomet/49.1-2.265")
David, H. (1988). The method of paired comparisons. London: Griffin.
Kendall, M.G., & Babington Smith, B. (1940). On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 31 , 324--345. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1093/biomet/31.3-4.324")
See Also
eba, strans, kendall.u.
Examples
# A dog's preferences for six samples of food# (Kendall and Babington Smith, 1940, p. 326)dog <- matrix(c(0,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0),6,6, byrow=TRUE)dimnames(dog)<- setNames(rep(list(c("meat","biscuit","chocolate","apple","pear","cheese")),2), c(">","<"))circular(dog, alternative="less")# moderate consistencysubset(strans(dog)$violdf,!wst)# list circular triads