size: non-negative real number; precision or number of binomial trials.
mean: mean proportion or probability of success on each trial; 0 < mean < 1.
prior: (see below) with prior = 0 (default) the distribution corresponds to re-parametrized beta distribution used in beta regression. This parameter needs to be non-negative.
log, log.p: logical; if TRUE, probabilities p are given as log(p).
lower.tail: logical; if TRUE (default), probabilities are P[X≤x]
otherwise, P[X>x].
p: vector of probabilities.
n: number of observations. If length(n) > 1, the length is taken to be the number required.
Details
Beta can be understood as a distribution of x=k/ϕ proportions in ϕ trials where the average proportion is denoted as μ, so it's parameters become α=ϕμ and β=ϕ(1−μ) and it's density function becomes
where π is a prior parameter, so the distribution is a posterior distribution after observing ϕμ successes and ϕ(1−μ) failures in ϕ trials with binomial likelihood and symmetric Beta(π,π) prior for probability of success. Parameter value π=1 corresponds to uniform prior; π=1/2 corresponds to Jeffreys prior; π=0
corresponds to "uninformative" Haldane prior, this is also the re-parametrized distribution used in beta regression. With π=0 the distribution can be understood as a continuous analog to binomial distribution dealing with proportions rather then counts. Alternatively ϕ may be understood as precision parameter (as in beta regression).
Notice that in pre-1.8.4 versions of this package, prior was not settable and by default fixed to one, instead of zero. To obtain the same results as in the previous versions, use prior = 1 in each of the functions.
Examples
x <- rprop(1e5,100,0.33)hist(x,100, freq =FALSE)curve(dprop(x,100,0.33),0,1, col ="red", add =TRUE)hist(pprop(x,100,0.33))plot(ecdf(x))curve(pprop(x,100,0.33),0,1, col ="red", lwd =2, add =TRUE)n <-500p <-0.23k <- rbinom(1e5, n, p)hist(k/n, freq =FALSE,100)curve(dprop(x, n, p),0,1, col ="red", add =TRUE, n =500)
References
Ferrari, S., & Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799-815.
Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54-71.