signif: Numeric value for the significance level used in the test. Default: 0.05.
output: Defines the type of output. If "simple", a simple data frame is created, with only essential information about the test. If "table", more information is provided, and if "full", a data frame with informations about the test and both variables is created. Default: "simple".
Returns
A data frame. Its dimensions will vary, according to the output argument.
Details
This test is used to compare two variables, usually a proposed method, and a standard variable.This test is popular among forestry engineers, specially because, since it considers all data in it's analysis, it's usually more precise than a standard mean t-test. If the data has outliers, the mean may not represent the data correctly, so Graybill F test is specially useful for heterogeneous data.
A simple model regression is applied, and it's significance is evaluated by applying Graybill F test for the parameters estimate, according to the methodology described by Graybill (1976).
Examples
library(forestmangr)data("exfm11")head(exfm11)# The data frame exfm11 contains a height variable called "TH". This will be our# standard value. We'll compare it to height estimated using different hypsometric equations.# These are variables "TH_EST1" and "TH_EST2":graybill_f( exfm11,"TH","TH_EST1")# TH_EST1 is statistically different from "TH".# It's possible to alter the test's significance level using the signif argument:graybill_f( exfm11,"TH","TH_EST1", signif =0.01)# Different output options are available through the output argument:graybill_f( exfm11,"TH","TH_EST2", output="table")graybill_f( exfm11,"TH","TH_EST2", output="full")
References
Campos, J. C. C. and Leite, H. G. (2017) Mensuracao Florestal: Perguntas e Respostas. 5a. Vicosa: UFV.
Graybill, F. A. (1976) Theory and application of the linear model. Massachusets: Ouxburg 239 Press.
Leite, H. G. and Oliveira, F. H. T. (2006) Statistical procedure to test identity between analytical methods, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33(7–8), pp. 1105–1118.