Simultaneous Inference for Multiple Marginal Models
Simultaneous Inference for Multiple Marginal Models
Calculation of correlation between test statistics from multiple marginal models using the score decomposition
mmm(...)mlf(...)
Arguments
...: A names argument list containing fitted models (mmm) or definitions of linear functions (mlf). If only one linear function is defined for mlf, it will be applied to all models in mmm by glht.mlf.
Details
Estimated correlations of the estimated parameters of interest from the multiple marginal models are obtained using a stacked version of the i.i.d. decomposition of parameter estimates by means of score components (first derivatives of the log likelihood). The method is less conservative than the Bonferroni correction. The details are provided by Pipper, Ritz and Bisgaard (2012).
The implementation assumes that the model were fitted to the same data, i.e., the rows of the matrices returned by estfun belong to the same observations for each model.
The reference distribution is always multivariate normal, if you want to use the multivariate t, please specify the corresponding degrees of freedom as an additional df argument to glht.
Observations with missing values contribute zero to the score function. Models have to be fitted using na.exclude as na.action
argument.
Returns
An object of class mmm or mlf, basically a named list of the arguments with a special method for glht being available for the latter. vcov, estfun, and bread methods are available for objects of class mmm.
References
Christian Bressen Pipper, Christian Ritz and Hans Bisgaard (2011), A Versatile Method for Confirmatory Evaluation of the Effects of a Covariate in Multiple Models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 61 , 315--326.
Author(s)
Code for the computation of the joint covariance and sandwich matrices was contributed by Christian Ritz and Christian B. Pipper.
Examples
### replicate analysis of Hasler & Hothorn (2011), ### A Dunnett-Type Procedure for Multiple Endpoints,### The International Journal of Biostatistics: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 3.### DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1258library("sandwich")### see ?coagulationif(require("SimComp")){ data("coagulation", package ="SimComp")### level "S" is the standard, "H" and "B" are novel procedures coagulation$Group <- relevel(coagulation$Group, ref ="S")### fit marginal models(m1 <- lm(Thromb.count ~ Group, data = coagulation))(m2 <- lm(ADP ~ Group, data = coagulation))(m3 <- lm(TRAP ~ Group, data = coagulation))### set-up Dunnett comparisons for H - S and B - S ### for all three models g <- glht(mmm(Thromb = m1, ADP = m2, TRAP = m3), mlf(mcp(Group ="Dunnett")), alternative ="greater")### joint correlation cov2cor(vcov(g))### simultaneous p-values adjusted by taking the correlation### between the score contributions into account summary(g)### simultaneous confidence intervals confint(g)### compare with## Not run: library("SimComp") SimCiDiff(data = coagulation, grp ="Group", resp = c("Thromb.count","ADP","TRAP"), type ="Dunnett", alternative ="greater", covar.equal =TRUE)## End(Not run)### use sandwich variance matrix g <- glht(mmm(Thromb = m1, ADP = m2, TRAP = m3), mlf(mcp(Group ="Dunnett")), alternative ="greater", vcov = sandwich) summary(g) confint(g)}### attitude towards science datadata("mn6.9", package ="TH.data")### one model for each itemmn6.9.y1 <- glm(y1 ~ group, family = binomial(), na.action = na.omit, data = mn6.9)mn6.9.y2 <- glm(y2 ~ group, family = binomial(), na.action = na.omit, data = mn6.9)mn6.9.y3 <- glm(y3 ~ group, family = binomial(), na.action = na.omit, data = mn6.9)mn6.9.y4 <- glm(y4 ~ group, family = binomial(), na.action = na.omit, data = mn6.9)### test all parameters simulaneouslysummary(glht(mmm(mn6.9.y1, mn6.9.y2, mn6.9.y3, mn6.9.y4), mlf(diag(2))))### group differencessummary(glht(mmm(mn6.9.y1, mn6.9.y2, mn6.9.y3, mn6.9.y4), mlf("group2 = 0")))### alternative analysis of Klingenberg & Satopaa (2013),### Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Comparing Margins of### Multivariate Binary Data, CSDA, 64, 87-98### http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.02.016### see supplementary material for data description### NOTE: this is not the real data but only a subsampleinfluenza <- structure(list(HEADACHE = c(1L,0L,0L,1L,0L,0L,1L,1L,1L,0L,0L,1L,0L,1L,0L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,0L,0L,0L,0L,1L,1L), MALAISE = c(0L,0L,1L,1L,0L,1L,1L,1L,0L,1L,0L,0L,1L,1L,0L,0L,1L,0L,1L,0L,1L,0L,1L,1L,0L,1L,0L), PYREXIA = c(0L,0L,0L,0L,0L,1L,0L,1L,0L,0L,1L,1L,1L,1L,0L,0L,0L,0L,0L,1L,1L,1L,0L,0L,0L,1L,1L), ARTHRALGIA = c(0L,0L,0L,0L,1L,0L,1L,0L,1L,1L,0L,0L,1L,1L,0L,1L,0L,0L,1L,0L,0L,0L,0L,1L,1L,1L,1L), group = structure(c(2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,2L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L,1L), .Label = c("pla","trt"), class ="factor"), Freq = c(32L,165L,10L,23L,3L,1L,4L,2L,4L,2L,1L,1L,1L,1L,167L,1L,11L,37L,7L,7L,5L,3L,3L,1L,2L,4L,2L)), .Names = c("HEADACHE","MALAISE","PYREXIA","ARTHRALGIA","group","Freq"), row.names = c(1L,2L,3L,5L,9L,36L,43L,50L,74L,83L,139L,175L,183L,205L,251L,254L,255L,259L,279L,281L,282L,286L,302L,322L,323L,366L,382L), class ="data.frame")influenza <- influenza[rep(1:nrow(influenza), influenza$Freq),1:5]### Fitting marginal logistic regression models(head_logreg <- glm(HEADACHE ~ group, data = influenza, family = binomial()))(mala_logreg <- glm(MALAISE ~ group, data = influenza, family = binomial()))(pyre_logreg <- glm(PYREXIA ~ group, data = influenza, family = binomial()))(arth_logreg <- glm(ARTHRALGIA ~ group, data = influenza, family = binomial()))### Simultaneous inference for log-oddsxy.sim <- glht(mmm(head = head_logreg, mala = mala_logreg, pyre = pyre_logreg, arth = arth_logreg), mlf("grouptrt = 0"))summary(xy.sim)confint(xy.sim)### Artificial examples### Combining linear regression and logistic regressionset.seed(29)y1 <- rnorm(100)y2 <- factor(y1 + rnorm(100, sd =.1)>0)x1 <- gl(4,25)x2 <- runif(100,0,10)m1 <- lm(y1 ~ x1 + x2)m2 <- glm(y2 ~ x1 + x2, family = binomial())### Note that the same explanatory variables are considered in both models### but the resulting parameter estimates are on 2 different scales ### (original and log-odds scales)### Simultaneous inference for the same parameter in the 2 model fitssummary(glht(mmm(m1 = m1, m2 = m2), mlf("x12 = 0")))### Simultaneous inference for different parameters in the 2 model fitssummary(glht(mmm(m1 = m1, m2 = m2), mlf(m1 ="x12 = 0", m2 ="x13 = 0")))### Simultaneous inference for different and identical parameters in the 2### model fitssummary(glht(mmm(m1 = m1, m2 = m2), mlf(m1 = c("x12 = 0","x13 = 0"), m2 ="x13 = 0")))### Examples for binomial data### Two independent outcomesy1.1<- rbinom(100,1,0.45)y1.2<- rbinom(100,1,0.55)group <- factor(rep(c("A","B"),50))m1 <- glm(y1.1~ group, family = binomial)m2 <- glm(y1.2~ group, family = binomial)summary(glht(mmm(m1 = m1, m2 = m2), mlf("groupB = 0")))### Two perfectly correlated outcomesy2.1<- rbinom(100,1,0.45)y2.2<- y2.1group <- factor(rep(c("A","B"),50))m1 <- glm(y2.1~ group, family = binomial)m2 <- glm(y2.2~ group, family = binomial)summary(glht(mmm(m1 = m1, m2 = m2), mlf("groupB = 0")))### use sandwich covariance matrixsummary(glht(mmm(m1 = m1, m2 = m2), mlf("groupB = 0"), vcov = sandwich))